Khan was removed from office a year ago by a no-confidence vote in Parliament, but he still holds fervent support in many areas. The violence has escalated a long burning confrontation between the former prime minister and Sharif’s government. Chief Justice Bandial “now should hoist the flag of Imran Khan’s party on the Supreme Court, or he should declare that the court is a sub-office of Imran’s party,” Azam Tarar, an adviser for Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif, told reporters.ĭefense Minister Khawaja Mohammad Asif called it a “special reprieve” for the former prime minister, saying the court ignored his supporters’ attacks on military and government installations. The ruling infuriated the government, with multiple officials accusing the chief justice of bias toward Khan. The minister is not related to the former prime minister. Speaking on Pakistan’s Dunya TV, Interior Minister Rana Sanaullah Khan vowed, “We will arrest him again,” perhaps on charges that were announced a day earlier of inciting the wave of violence. Khan may also ask the court for protection from future arrest on the corruption charges. Khan will appear Friday before the Islamabad High Court to reconsider its earlier ruling that the arrest was legal. Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial urged Khan to appeal to his supporters to remain peaceful. The head of his legal team, Babar Awan, underlined that Khan is a “free citizen” and will be allowed to meet with lawyers and supporters. The Supreme Court ruled Khan’s arrest two days ago was illegal and, while it freed him from custody, it ordered him kept under protection of security forces in a safe location in the capital, Islamabad. Read more: Pakistani rupee falls to record low as civil unrest compounds country’s problems The government responded with a crackdown on Khan’s supporters, arresting more than 2,000 so far. Since Khan’s dramatic arrest on Tuesday, protesters have been clashing with police in areas around the country, and mobs have attacked military and government sites, trying to storm the military’s main headquarters and burning down the residence of a top general in Lahore. Circuit Court of Appeals.Īn injunction can be ordered if a judge believes that the plaintiffs have a likelihood of prevailing on the merits of their case, something multiple courts have not found.Ĭoney Barrett has not given an indication on when she would rule on a potential injunction in the case.For a nation accustomed to military takeovers, political crises and violence, the turmoil of the past week has been unprecedented. That decision was overturned by a federal court of appeals in Chicago, leaving it in the hands of the 7 th U.S. District Judge Stephen McGlynn temporarily blocked enforcement of the assault weapons ban. The plaintiffs in the case had earned a short-term victory earlier this year when U.S. Merchants are required to sell or return their current stock of the weapons, and Illinois-based manufacturers can still sell their products outside of the state. Those who currently own the weapons are required to register them with the Illinois State Police. It also bans specific attachments, extended magazines and rapid-firing devices. HB 5471 bans the delivery, sale and purchase of assault weapons in the state, impacting dozens of specific types of firearms. Shooting in Matteson Leaves 9-Year-Old Boy Dead, Woman Wounded
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |